Bottom rot
| Contributor: | Association de Coordination Technique Agricole |
| Date Compiled: | 2024 |
Prevention
| Solution | Production stage (if possible with reference to BBCH scale) |
|---|---|
|
Crop rotations
|
Pre-season
|
Monitoring
| Solution |
|---|
|
If there is damage present in 5% of the plants observed
|
Control
Regulations surrounding biological products can change rapidly – always verify products recommended here with the most recent legislation and lists of products registered for your country
| Solution | Product Category | Production stage (if possible with reference to BBCH scale) | Max nb. of a. i. application/year | Application Details and Notes (commercial product example) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Coniothyrium minitans
|
Microbiological fungicide
|
Soil treatment before sowing or transplanting
|
|
(CONTANS ® ) Dosage: 2 - 4 Kg/ha
|
|
Pseudomonas sp. strain DSMZ 13134
|
Microbiological fungicide
|
BBCH 12-81
|
3
|
(PRORADIX® ) Dosage: 125 g/ha
|
|
Trichoderma asperellum (strain T25)
|
Microbiological fungicide
|
|
5
|
(TUSAL ® ) Dosage: 0,5 - 1 Kg/ha
|
|
Trichoderma asperellum (strain T34)
|
Microbiological fungicide
|
BBCH 10 - 79
|
2
|
(T34 BIOCONTROL) Dosage: 0,25 kg/ha
|
|
Trichoderma atroviride strain SC1 1
|
Microbiological fungicide
|
|
8
|
(VINTEC® ) Dosage:0,025 - 0,15 Kg/ha
|
|
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum, strain D747
|
Microbiological fungicide
|
|
1 - 6
|
(AMYLO-X WG® ) Dosage: 1,5 - 2,5 Kg/ha
|
|
Pythium oligandrum (strain M1)
|
Microbiological fungicide
|
BBCH 10 - 88
|
1 - 4
|
(POLYVERSUM® ) Dosage: 0,1 - 0,3 Kg/ha
|
|
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (strain MBI 600)
|
Microbiological fungicide
|
BBCH 10-49
|
6
|
(SERIFEL) Dosage: 0,5 Kg/ha
|
|
Trichoderma atroviride (strain I-1237)
|
Microbiological fungicide
|
|
1
|
(TRI-SOIL WP® ) Dosage: 2,5 - 5 Kg/ha
|
The information made available here has been obtained from or is based upon sources believed by CABI to be reliable but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. Anyone acting or relying on such information does so entirely at their own risk. The efficacy of the IPM methods included above will depend on local conditions and might not always be suitable everywhere within the specified country.